Sunday, November 13, 2016

The Quality of Disagreement

The human being is multi-dimensional in his structure carrying with him a body, a mind and a soul.  While the soul is hidden equally within all of creation, the potential of the mind to express varies among the various creatures of the biosphere and is highly evolved in man compared to other creatures on planet earth.  Even among human beings, the potential of the subtle body comprising of the mind-memory-intelligence complex is evolved variedly leading to different levels in one’s ability to comprehend, assimilate, articulate and express.  This varied potential in the subtle body of the human being can find expression in infinitely innumerable ways. 

As human awareness comes down from an integrating intelligence into the realm of the mind it is split into two – making up the duality of the manifest universe – space and time, matter and energy; the male and the female; the right and the left; light and darkness, sound and silence, motion and stillness and so on and so forth.  While duality in nature is essential to the constitution of form and for the three unending processes of creation, sustenance and destruction, this apparent duality is always unified by an underlying integrating principle.  The duality of the mind is akin to the dicotyledonous seed from which the sprout of life emerges.  The mind is a product of this duality in nature and as such carries at once the two twigs required to strike the fire of human expression. 

While we express an opinion, an identity forms simultaneously and tends to carve a place for itself and as the same identity is retained and expressed repeatedly, it gives rise to a false identity called the ego.  Having no roots in the core of the human spirit, the ego is a shadow personality that everyone carries.  In some it is almost transparent while in others, it is dark and almost opaque.  This opacity shields our awareness from crossing the ego barrier and prevents us from reaching into the depths of our personality, into the realm of the soul which is untouched by human opinion or identity. 

It is therefore important for us to consider the quality of our expression.  The most common characteristic of the ego is the assertion of its opinion as superior and its tendency to draw a false strength from its disagreement with the viewpoints of others.  This quality of the ego comes from its insecurity because of its lack of connection to something that is timeless. 

While we express, we are actually in search of a truth, in search of a common core, in search of an explanation for life and its conflicts that will set our mind at rest and allow us peace and contentment.  This quality of our search is hidden and being unexpressed is overcome by the expressions of an ego, of an unnatural sense of self that seeks to survive on its own through physical force, numerical majority and through the influence of divisive ideologies. 

Divide and rule – is a motto of the ego – not a natural principle.  While the natural principles of ‘survival of the fittest’ and ‘principles of natural selection’ are at play in the biosphere and in the human world, the value of the culture of a human community or society arises from a true understanding of what constitutes the ‘fittest’ and what constitutes ‘natural selection’.   The ego tends to interpret that the fittest are those that are physically and financially the fittest; and natural selection is assumed as one’s birth right and position.  And it takes pride in expressing one’s outermost nature with unfettered vocalization of every thought without care, concern or any kind of educated filter.

The mark of a cultured human being does not lie in his ability to merely express what he thinks.  It lies in being circumspect about the same expression.  It lies in being deliberately reluctant to express anything without due consideration to the feelings of those who will be subjected to it, of those who will fall within its influence.  This is what constitutes culture – it is the appropriate degree of consideration for all dimensions of influence of an expression of communication between two sides, wherein the disagreeable is expressed in a subdued manner; the agreeable is expressed in a manner that carries an element of sincere appreciation; and the integrating root of that which unites the two sides is expressed with the most honestly felt intensity and a hint of gratitude for the unmistakable existence of oneness within the innermost heart of every relationship.  At every level the aspect of culture carries with it the exalted fragrance of non-violence.

And a lack of culture is the opposite of it.  It fails to find at the outset that which unifies any two sides and see this evidence or proof that no unity exists at any level.  It fails the test of decorum in expressing that which is agreeable and instead expresses the same with loudness and unbecoming wild cheer that eventually is bound to leave a sour aftertaste.  And that which is the cause of disagreement is vociferously spelt out and the protestations are seen as an expression of right.  The world of swearing and cursing arises from this non acceptance of disagreement and results in acts of discord, hate and violence.  It stems from the inability to raise our consciousness from the divisive mind field to an integrating field of a larger, more durable underlying objective that remains unseen and unfelt amidst the mental noise of disagreement.
In fact we seem to utterly mistake what our rights are and what our privileges are.  We think we have the right to speak anything we want; while what we really have is the privilege to express what ought to be truly expressed.  We think we have the right to work, while what we really have is the great privilege of contributing to the wellbeing of our fellow citizens, our community and our country, and gratefully take our due share in it.  We think we have freedom, but what we do very often with this is that as a result our thoughtless action we get caught up in its web of repercussions. 

We pride ourselves that we are doing some good, while all it is - is that we are awarded this great privilege of being of some use, some service to someone or some cause.  We pride ourselves that we love somebody or something while all it is - is that we have realized the source of love within ourselves and found a person to share this precious gift with.     

This confusion in mistaking privileges for rights arises from a lack of understanding of the nature of the human mind and of the truth of our physical, mental and spiritual dimensions.  The mind is a slave by its very nature.  No matter what you think through your mind and say or act, there is a governing ideology that is driving it.  Inherently the mind needs a master.  This gives rise to an entire world of competing idea structures struggling to govern and control the mind.  The entire field of human psychology stems from a study of these mind structures and their power over the human being.  And none of these structures that arise in the mind field are capable of putting the mind to rest.  It is like trying to find the smartest child to control the other children in a class.  It can be done temporarily but sooner or later it is bound to collapse and the children will be about their tricks again.  It is only when the parent who knows what’s best for the child arrives at the scene and with an assured look makes a sign, that the child will keep its mischief down and obediently do the right thing. 

And what is the right thing?  The right is that which is in the best interest of the child’s wellbeing in all its dimensions and that which will nurture the child’s ability to reach its fullest potential as a human being.  And we must teach the child to handle disagreement with care and a cool approach of strength and wisdom.  If someone is bullying it, we must teach it to stay away from such kids and out of trouble.  If someone is using bad words and ranting uncontrollably at someone else, we must teach the child not to mimic such expressions.  If someone is using swear words, we must teach our child to rise above the temptation to use them. 

Parents and teachers must teach the child from the lessons of life that they have learnt and impart the truth about life and the wisdom of living from the writings of the great masters.  It is not the role of a teacher to allow the child to express what comes to a child’s mind and then make a lesson from it.  As we grow we must become wiser and this wisdom must carry a value, and bring about a weight into our expression.  While expression is natural in children, as we grow into adulthood, our expression must carry the wealth of strength and assurance that comes from a life well lived.   

In adult life also, our thoughts are like our children and they need the same kind of disciplining.  As we moderate and express our thoughts with care and concern, we become more and more cultured, more sophisticated in our manner of response.  And yet this sophistication betrays a simplicity that is a reflection of the simplicity that accompanies the greatest truths of life.  The more cultured we become, the more soft spoken and poised we become.  A large number of events in our lives get resolved on their own.  They merely need a nudge in the right direction – a direction that unifies us in the long run and suppresses that which divides us. 

Disagreement is the sprouting field for violence and therefore the absence of culture in disagreement results in violence.  And the presence of culture in the quality of disagreement is marked by a deeply felt presence of non-violence.  This was the basis on India’s philosophy of non-violence in its struggle for freedom.  Mahatma Gandhi recognized the violence perpetrated by the colonial rulers and disagreed strongly with that position.  And yet our disagreement was expressed through the instruments of non-violent protestations and ultimately India won its freedom without resorting to violence.  This is a cultured manner of disagreement. 

Thus the manner of expression of disagreement is a distinct marker in our test of the presence of culture or the lack of it.  One ought to realize that though our bodies may be different, our minds may often look different ways, there will always remain a deeper spiritual self which is common to our existence and that we emerge out into the numerical many from a unified core. 


May expressions that divide our society reduce and dwindle by the hour and may expressions that incite violence find no takers in a world marked by true culture and timeless wisdom.  May a deeply felt love and respect for that which is deeply shared amongst all of us be reflected in a culture that is tolerant of the journeys and life stories of others, appreciative of the strengths, valour and wisdom of many, and encouraging of the expressions of innate peace and wellbeing of a mature and considerate society; of a hardworking and sincere work force and of a happy and celebrating family, community, nation and the world.